Linear Expansion Lab
This Experiment was done in order to calculate the linear
heat expansion constant, α. The Experiment
consisted of a rod, rotary device, Temperature probe, and logger pro. Once obtaining the α we will be able to determine
the material of the rod.
In the picture above, there are two graphs: Temperature vs
Time and Change in Angle vs Time. The
graphs were utilized to obtain the change in temperature, ΔT and the
change in angle of the rotary, ΔΘ.
This picture displays our calculation for α,
by using the data obtained from the experiment.
α= 2.95 X
10^-5 °C^-1.
After obtaining the linear expansion constant we determined
its uncertainty, 3.904 x 10^5 (1/C)
.
We were then able to compare our value
the chart in of linear expansion constant in the book and, therefore, deduced
that the rod is made up of aluminum material because it has a constant of α= 2.4 X
10^-5 °C^-1. We are able to
state its aluminum because it falls under the uncertainty of our experimental
value.
Latent Heat of Vaporization
In this Experiment we heated a cup
of water with a known mass in order to obtain the Latent heat of
vaporization. We utilized an immersion to
heat up the water and a temperature probe.
The Graph above is a Temperature
vs. Time graph. This graph displayed the
temperature rising until till levels out at 100 °C. Thus, at this point it is in the process of
Latent heat of Vaporization. We then
utilized this graph to obtain time it took to reach 100°C.
The picture above is our
calculation of Latent heat of Vaporization. We utilized time to calculate the
heat from the heat rate of the immersion.
We then measured the change in mass from the water lost to vapor. We
then obtained that L_v= 2409140 J
Using the Values obtained from the
group we obtained a standard deviation of the average value. Thus, we were able to obtain an uncertainty
of ±836164.998
J/Kg. As a result, we are able to
declare that our value for latent heat of vaporization falls within the
uncertainty of the actual value of latent heat of vaporization from the book, 2256 * 10 ^3 J/Kg.
Determining the Ideal Gas Laws:
Boyels Law
In this Experiment, we wanted to
find the physical meaning behind the relationship of Pressure Vs. Volume. We utilized a syringe to and pressure sensor
to mark the change in pressure as volume decreased.
The Graph of Pressure Vs. Volume
Describes that they are inversely proportional to each other.
The
Picture above shows why the graph equation P=A/V is measured in (J/cc). A is the amount of energy within the
container at a constant temperature and quantity inside. So, one may state that the as the volume at a
low volume there is a high pressure indicating a high energy while large volume
displays a low pressure which will indicate a small amount of energy inside.
P vs. T Charles law II
In this experiment we wanted to
find the concept of Charles gas Law. The
items utilized were a flask with a constant volume and pressure of air in order
to see the different reactions it had when temperature change occurred from
cold temperature, room temperature and warm temperature. We would analyze the change through logger
pro and temperature and pressure probes.
The graph above displays a linear relationship
between pressure and temperature. It
shows that as temperature rises, the pressure proportionally rises as well.
The picture above shows that since
the volume and quantity are constant we may treat it this product as a constant
value; thus, the final equation above shows that pressure is proportional to
the change in temperature.